McGann argues that majority votes help protect minority rights, at least in Dendamit, where consultations are taking place. The argument is that cycling ensures that parties that lose against a majority have an interest in staying in the group process, as the decision can be easily overturned by another majority. Moreover, if it wants to overturn a decision, a minority must form a coalition with only enough group members to ensure that more than half of them approve of the new proposal. (Under super-majority rules, a minority may need a coalition of just over a majority to overturn a decision.)  Consensus decisions are an alternative to routine group decision-making.  Robert`s rules, for example, are a guide that is used by many organizations. This book helps to structure the debate and adopt proposals that can be adopted by a majority. It does not insist on the objective of a comprehensive agreement. Critics of such a process believe it may involve conflicting debates and the formation of competing political groups. This dynamic can damage the relationship between group members and compromise a group`s ability to implement a contentious decision in a cooperative manner. Consensus decisions attempt to address the beliefs of these problems. Supporters say that the results of the consensus process are:  Japanese companies generally use consensual decisions, which means that unanimous support to the board of directors is sought for each decision.  A ringi-sho is a circulation document with which an agreement is reached.
It must first be signed by the top of the lowest level, then upwards, and perhaps it needs to be revised and the process must be started from the front.  Some argue [who?] that deliberative democracy thrives under majority rule. They state that under the majority rule, participants must always convince at least half of the group, while participants, under excessive rules, have only a minority to convince.  In addition, proponents argue that cycling gives participants an interest in compromise rather than trying to make decisions that have only the minimum necessary to „win“.  The „simple majority“ or „majority“ is defined as greater than 50% and the „super majority“ is defined as a percentage determined by the members, greater than a simple majority.